Malta. c. July 1943. A group of airmen of No. 3
(Kittyhawk) Squadron RAAF, at an advanced landing ground in Malta.
Identified are: Squadron Leader Reg Stevens
(second from left); other side, pilots, Flight Sergeant Ted
Hankey;
Flight Lieutenant Brian Harris, and Pilot Officer Jack Sergeant.
![]()
Transcript of Australian War
Memorial recording.
This historically-important interview has been placed here so that
its content is searchable for 3SQN Website readers.
[WORKING VERSION
- Currently being edited by 3SQN Assn for readability and spelling
of technical terms.]
INFORMANT: REG STEVENS
SUBJECT OF INTERVIEW: 3 SQUADRON, RAAF
DATE OF INTERVIEW: 5 JULY 1990
INTERVIEWER: EDWARD STOKES
TRANSCRIBER: SUSAN SOAMES
Identification: This is Edward Stokes with Reg
Stevens of 3 Squadron on 5 July 1990.
I think you were saying you finished school, or got to
the Intermediate level but didn't in fact do the Intermediate.
Didn't like school so I didn't do the Intermediate.
Right.
I think actually you loathed school.
On occasions.
You were saying that after that you worked, I think,
quantity surveying for a builder in the years after leaving
school. Just a few questions about that period. Were you
particularly conscious as a boy, as a young man, of the general story
of Australians in the first war, the ANZAC tradition, or not?
Oh yes. I was quite conversant. I had an uncle
who was in the first war and I was quite conscious of it. But I
don't think it ever came home to me until I was rather
more adult.
And what about the - I know this was when you were later
in PNG - the political developments in Europe in the later 1930s, the
rise of Hitler to power and so on, did you see the omens of war, or
not? Did you talk about it with your mates?
Yes, we were very, very conscious of it, mainly a fear of the Japanese,
or, not exactly a fear of the Japanese, but we did see a great number of
their fishing boats, or so-called fishing boats, that were absolutely
festooned in electronics and whatnots. The
European war, that was the major one that we were concerned with, and
it was then that I thought, well, should there be anything come of
these wars and Hitler and his Germany, that perhaps we'd have to
participate in it.
And I think in fact you were in the Militia as a young
man?
Yes. When I was under eighteen I put my age up and joined
the artillery - horse-drawn artillery.
Right. Well, moving on a little bit Reg, I
know at age nineteen you went up to Papua New Guinea and worked there
in a trading company, later in the administration. I think
when 11 Squadron arrived there you became quite interested, or perhaps
had been always, in the air force.
When 11 Squadron came up there, I was fortunate in meeting the adjutant who was a great friend of mine, a Gordon Steege, who was also at school with me. And, of course, I became quite interested in their Walrus aircraft. But prior to that I'd flown in the Guba, which was the Archbold expedition aircraft, and perhaps that whetted my appetite for future work.
Right. We should put down for the record too
that you were married in 1938 and your wife's still here today.
Did you ever talk about flying and the possibility of flying together,
or not?
No, I don't think so. Did we, dear?
(Mrs Stevens) No, no. You never said anything at all.
It was a shock. When war was declared he said to me, 'I'm going to
fly Spitfires'. Irrespective of a six months' old baby, it didn't
occur to him.
Right, yes. Well, war was declared late
1939. What was your first thought when war was declared?
Do you remember the date?
I certainly remember it and I remember Bob Menzies mentioning that we
were now at war with Germany and the first thought that went through my
mind was: well, I have more to lose being married
and with one child and under those circumstances I felt that it was an
absolute duty to go and join the war.
Right. Well, I know you were called up in
mid-40. Your wife left PNG for Australia about mid-40.
You, yourself left September '40 and November '40 you were at
Bradfield, initial training. What's your first recollection of
the air force?
Well, what do you mean? Do you mean the air force or do you mean
the actual initial training?
Yes, there's a difference, isn't there? Yes, I
should have said what was Bradfield like?
Bradfield was not terribly good, and especially when I hadn't cleaned
my shoes for a number of years having had natives to do it, and then to
have to turn around, make my bed, clean my boots, clean my
shoes; I wasn't terribly impressed.
(5.00) That general discipline, parade-ground
bashing and the rest of it, do you think that carried over into in-air
discipline or was it just .... Or are they totally different
things?
Oh, I do think that it's carried over and not only into
the air discipline but also into my .... Even today I feel that
that discipline was something that has carried me through a tremendous
amount of worries and has given me more confidence than perhaps I've
ever had before.
We were just talking about the harsher aspects of
service discipline. You had a Sergeant ...?
Sergeant 'Bully' and he was a .... Well, he wasn't a particularly
fine fellow. No great friend of mine. On one occasion he
asked for three volunteers in the normal manner of you, you and you and
said, 'Okay, you'll clean out the latrines', to which I
said, 'I'd come down from New Guinea and I was not going to clean out
latrines'. At any rate I finally did clean out latrines and
perhaps I enjoyed doing it.
Well, moving on a little bit, Reg. From Bradfield
you went to Mascot elementary flying training on Tigers. So
you're up in the air at last, flying. Did flying live up to your
hopes, or not?
Oh yes, very much so. But I still looked on it as a means to an
end and not as an enjoyment.
Right. So you're not saying then that you were the
kind .... I mean, some pilots swore that flying in itself was a
great love and a thing worthwhile in itself.
No, definitely not.
So
the means was to the end of fighting?
That's all.
Right. Going on to Wagga where you did your
service flying training, I think this was Wirraways, what's your
recollection of the courses that you did there, and what were the main
subjects you studied besides actually flying Wirraways?
Well, I'll always remember the people who were scrubbed
from flying. And on arrival at Wagga we were met by these
dissidents who said, 'Oh, you'll never fly those Wirraways.
They're dangerous', and this, that and the other thing. But we
found and I found that they were quite an easy aeroplane to fly and
very, very comfortable. As far as the exercises, apart from the
actual flying, we had lots of navigation, map reading, and the
likes. Mainly I suppose to give us a grounding on our
cross-country flights.
Right. Was there ever any study of tactics -
fighting tactics?
The study of which?
Tactics?
Ah, no, not at that stage.
Right. What are the other chief recollections of
that period at Wagga, Reg?
I found there was a very, very delightful station. The CO was now
Sir Frederick Scherger (deceased), and he kept a very,
very .... Ran a very, very good station. The food was
extremely good and ever so much better than that at Mascot, which also
was very good.
Mmm. Of course you would have been one of the few
men training at least who were married, did that set you apart at all
from your other fellow course members?
No, not a bit, Ed.
Right. Well, I guess, in fact, they weren't really
very much older than you. You were married fairly young and
probably much of an age with the other pilots?
I'd say there were very few people older than myself, but generally
around the same age.
Well, the quality of the training, just to finish with:
if you had to rate your training up to this period - good, mediocre,
very good, poor - how would you rate it?
Oh, the training was absolutely excellent - splendid.
Well, moving on. You were posted to England and
left on 10th August '41. That departure from Australia,
especially being a married man, must have been bittersweet I'd
imagine. How do you recall all that?
It was with very mixed emotions that we sailed on the
Awatea. I knew that I was leaving a wife and a child, but
I think she realised that that was very much in my make-up, and that I
wanted to be part of it.
Part
of the war effort?
Yes.
(Mrs Stevens) And his brother had sailed a week before to
Malaysia [sic].
Right. Yes. This is just for the record
too. This was one of your other brothers going to Malaya, Reg?
(10.00) Yes. Clarrie sailed for Malaysia [sic] with 6
Div - 8 Div, I beg pardon.
Right. And he was the brother who did, or didn't,
come back?
No. He died in a POW camp at Sandakan.
Right. And Reg was saying his other brother came
back, an ex-POW, but much reduced.
Yes. Jim, who was the eldest son, the eldest boy, he came back five stone one out of the Japanese POW camp.
Right. Well, let's move on. You crossed the
Pacific I know to Vancouver and then across Canada to Halifax. I
think at Halifax you .... There was something of a disagreement
about the ship you were about to embark on?
Well, it was the filthiest ship, this was the Empress
of Asia, and it was absolutely filthy as it had just transported
some thousands of Italian prisoners of war from the desert and they
were a notoriously dirty mob. And we refused, point blank, to
sail on the ship. And later on the air officer commanding the
Canadian air force came down from Ottawa and saw that the ship was
cleaned up in a sense prior to our embarking, which we did, and
finally after I think it was thirteen days' sailing we reached
Liverpool after being north of Iceland and God knows where.
You were sailing, I think you said, as a lone
ship. The Atlantic was a dangerous place. What tensions
were there on board? Were you involved at all in the observation
and so on to defend the ship?
No, not exactly, Ed. The main thing that I found - I spent most
of my time on deck even though it was bitterly cold - and the main thing
there was to dodge sea-sick Canadian soldiers who were lying and
sprawled all over the deck, and, oh, pretty terrible
conditions.
Well, Bournemouth in England, I know you did have some
leave, and you were then posted down to 61 OTU, which was from a
period October through to mid-December 1941. I think this was
for a conversion course to Spitfires?
That's right, Ed. This was the culmination of, what, nearly
twelve months of wanting to fly these little toys and the conversion to
them was particularly good. Unfortunately, I pranged one of them,
a Spit 2, having run out of gas. My fault entirely and
I took full blame for it.
Could I just pause for a moment. Let's just pursue
that story for a moment. I'd imagine navigation was quite
tricky. Had you become lost and couldn't get back, or what?
Well, I knew that I was somewhere over England but I really
wasn't certain exactly where it was because I'd been low flying,
unauthorised low flying, and apparently the winds had swept me out and
I didn't know where I was actually. So I put down on the first
little place that I could find which was a place called Dagenham Park.
And
that was a wheels-down landing?
No, that was a wheels-up landing! The CO of the squadron of the
61 OTU, he wasn't very, very happy with it either.
Right. That must have been very difficult that
sort of, I mean, familiarisation with the plane. Could you tell
us in a little more detail the kinds of steps one went through in that
kind of conversion to a new aircraft?
Well, we initially started off by flying a Miles Magister which is a
very, very light aeroplane. From there we converted
onto a Master Inline and then to a Master Radial. Did a few
hours in those and then we were to set off solo in the Spitties.
The first solo flight in a plane as lively as a
Spitfire, could you recall that now? Was it a flight of
excitement or of trepidation?
I think mainly of excitement, Ed, in that in those early Spits we had
to pump the wheels up and I can imagine what it looked like just
leapfrogging across the strip itself, although it wasn't a strip, it was
an aerodrome. And I was very, very thankful when
it was in the air and I had the wheels safely pumped up.
Right. Reg, the Spitfire itself as a plane, what's
your memory of the plane?
The Spit 2, it was a delightful little aeroplane but it had fabric
ailerons and it was fairly heavy on those ailerons.
It was not until the Spit 5 came out with the duralumin ailerons that
they became the little pet that everyone loved to fly so very, very
much.
Mmm. That's interesting. I think you were
suggesting before that some people who'd flown Spits later found
Kittyhawks difficult, and there was a little bit of tension, I think
you were saying with Bobby Gibbes there?
(10.00) Nothing really difficult about flying a Kittyhawk but what
Gibbie was cranky about, and I go along with it, was that so many of the
boys who had flown Spitfires in England came out and said, 'Oh, my God,
we're not going to trundle those German tank-type things
around', and of course Gibbie got up no good about it. But
fortunately I kept my trap shut and that's why I got on well with Bob.
Right. Well, just for the record too, I think it's
interesting, we worked out before that on Spitfires you flew, I think,
thirty-seven hours and at the end of that OTU you had a total of 193
hours. Looking back in your estimation now, 193 hours, was that
more than sufficient or not enough to fit a man to fly in combat?
Definitely not enough. I'd say that .... I
didn't start to learn to fly until I had over 1,000 hours and to send
some of the young boys into combat at anything under 500 hours is
purely and simply murder to them.
Right. Mid-December 1941, in fact the 24th, you
were posted to 451 Squadron, an Australian Spitfire squadron on the
Isle of Man. I think it was a very cold winter. What's
your recollection of that?
Cold, yeah, I think it was cold. It really was cold. For
ten days on one occasion we were snowed in, nothing to do and, of
course, the CO thought we'd get some exercise by getting
us to shovel snow off the runways. He drove past in his car and
I think we half-filled the car up with snow. So that was the
finish of clearing runways.
Well, obviously coming from PNG, the cold must have
struck you. Your first Christmas overseas though, what's your
recollection of that?
It was quite a pleasant one. We had sufficient to eat and
sufficient to drink. The Isle of Man or the Manxmen, they turned
out a very, very nice bottle of beer, Castlemaine Blue I
think the name was, and the food was quite good. But there
wasn't very, very much of it, even though a number of our boys used to
skip across to Ireland and bring back hams and eggs, so there was
really no shortage and it was quite all right.
Did you have much contact incidentally at this time with
your wife back in Australia? How regularly were letters able to
pass to and fro?
I used to write pretty regularly, Ed, but some I'd send by sea mail and
some by airmail and later on, when I came home, I found
that on a lot of occasions the sea mail arrived before the
airmail. But there were also a lot of letters that just did not
get through, and on looking back now it's quite understandable with
all the sinkings that went on between England and Australia.
Yes, certainly. Turning to the work of 451
Squadron, what were the most common kinds of operations during your
time, your few months with the squadron?
Generally, convoy patrols and exercises. Different manners of
flying, whether it was to be in fluid pairs or fluid
fours. They were extremely good with their training, additional
training over there and I've got nothing but admiration for them.
Tell
us about a typical convoy patrol?
Oh, just, it's rather a dreary business of purely flying
around and around these infernal convoys. Fortunately we weren't
attacked by any 109s or even the Focke-Wulf 190s, we didn't even see
them in those days, but most dreary and I was pleased to get back on
the ground again.
Right. How long would a typical operation have
lasted?
With long-range tanks, about two hours.
Well, I know it was while you were at, or with 451, Reg,
that you had a major prang. I think it began with a tyre blowing
out. Tell us about that, about how the incident stays in your
memory?
Oh, I'll always remember it because I've still got a damn sore back
from it. But just coming in I made a normal approach and landing,
and halfway along the runway the starboard tyre blew out, and she slewed
over to the right off the runway itself into mud.
And of course she catapulted straight over. Well, I smacked my
head very, very hard - I was sitting high in the cockpit so that I
could look over the long nose of the Spittie - and I just couldn't
move, couldn't get out. Any rate the fire bods came out and I
can recall quite well them lifting the tail, two of the ground staff
boys lifting the tail and someone leant into the cockpit, pulled the
pins from my Sutton harness and I fell about another two feet on my
head. The next I remember is waking up in hospital, where I
think I was x-rayed and I was stuck in there for a week.
(20.00) Just undergoing general recuperation?
That and doing tests and whatnot. But I came out of it quite all
right.
Mmm. Those moments or minutes in the plane before
you were dragged out, what was going through your head?
I could hear the ticking of the identification 'Friend
or Foe', the IFF and the second thing was the infernal petrol might go
up. That was all.
Right. Well, we've had a look at a photograph of
that upside-down plane before. It was obviously a lucky
escape. After that, how easy was it to get back up into the air
again?
No problems, Ed. No problems at all.
Right. February 1942. Of course Japan by now
was in the war. In this scrapbook of yours, Reg, there's the
.... This is a report in the Daily Telegraph, February
16th, '42, Australian pilots of a Spitfire squadron recently cabled
the Australian Prime Minister, Mr Curtin, 'We demand to be recalled to
defend Australia'. What's your recollection of that feeling?
Mmm. We were all very, very much in favour of returning
to Australia to defend our own country - that's after the Nips came in
- but at the particular time to Mr Churchill - Winston Churchill - was
debating in the House of Commons whether or not the WAFs should wear
blue underwear, or whether they should wear black underwear rather
disgusted us and as a squadron, as an Australian squadron, our
thoughts immediately turned to home. And we thought, well, John
Curtin's the only person who can do any good for us.
Right. Hence the cable. What was the
response to it?
None. Absolutely none. Although later on in, later in the
year I think it was, the squadron was sent home with Spitfires, or as
they were called then Capstans. They were sent up to Darwin where
most of them - a lot of my good friends - were shot down
and killed.
Mmm. Was there any move on the part of the pilots
who sent that cable to follow it up in any way?
That I don't know, Ed, because I was posted out to the Middle East very
shortly after that happened.
Right. Well, let's move onto that. I know it
was February 15th, '42 you were posted. I think the climate was
a fairly major part of your request to leave?
Well, having lived in Papua New Guinea for so many years perhaps my
blood was fairly thin, either that or it was an extremely cold
winter. Any rate it didn't suit me. I didn't like the
climate and when the opportunity came I made application for the
Middle East and it was granted. And I was posted out without,
via West Africa by ship.
We might just interject here. There's a rather
nice note from your ... I think your logbook. This is a quote,
'Posted to the Middle East, what-o the warmer climate'. That
seems to sum it all up.
Certainly does, Ed.
Well, the journey to the Middle East was something of a
roundabout route. Just tell us the general details of that
journey, Reg?
Well, we went from Greenwich up in the Clyde in the armed merchant
cruiser El Qantara. Went as far as Freetown
in that where we transhipped then to a small wooden ship called the New
Northland. The New Northland had been trading and
been sailing on the Great Lakes, and whilst it was reasonably
comfortable it wasn't a ship to travel the oceans in, in my opinion.
Mmm. It seems a long way from the Great Lakes to
the west of Africa. I hope their navigation hadn't gone
wrong. Anyway it was aboard that ship that you got pushed on to
Lagos. I think from there you were taken by Pan American?
Pan Am flew us then right across Africa to Cairo. It took us
about five days. I must say that it was very comfortable
as a passenger on these DC3 and the Americans did, when we landed at
night-time, they looked after us extremely well. There was
always plenty of food and plenty of drink and good company.
Right. Well, the Middle East, which is the main
focus of the story, or your story with No. 3. I think you first
went to a training flight which was attached to 239 Wing?
Yes, 239 Wing had this training flight so that we became virtually a
pool for the whole of the wing, not only 3 Squadron.
(25.00) And this was basically, I think, for
conversion to Kittyhawks?
Yes. We converted firstly by flying the Harvard, which was very
similar to the Wirraway, and then into the Kittys, and we had absolutely
no trouble flying the Kittys. They were pretty heavy to fly and
perhaps landed a wee bit faster than the Spits, but they
were a good aeroplane and I have nothing against them.
I was just going to ask you, Reg, a little bit more
about the Kittys, perhaps, because it was the plane you spent your No.
3 time in at least. What's your recollection of the best and the
worst points of the Kitty as an aircraft - as a fighting aircraft?
One very good point is that they had 6.5 machine-guns firing
forward. The airframe itself could take a tremendous amount of
punishment and still keep flying. Unfortunately, if you lost your
'donk' [the engine] they had the gliding angle of a brick
and it was rather difficult to put down under those
circumstances. Still a very, very good aeroplane.
What about taking off and climbing? How did they
compare with other aircraft of their kind?
Oh, very, very slow take-off; very, very slow climb. Oh,
not so bad I suppose after about 10-12,000, but over that the Kitty-1s
were struggling to hit the 25,000 feet.
Landing I know for some pilots at least was something of
a problem, or something at least you'd come used to with Kittys, the
two or three-point landing and so on. What's your memory of
that?
Well, it was suggested that we wheel them in but there again, even
doing a three-pointer, it didn't worry us at all, and the Kitty was such
a heavy aeroplane that you three-pointed and it sat
down. Once it was on the deck, it stayed.
They did of course have a very long nose coming up over
the engine. What difficulties did that pose for taking off?
I don't think their motor was, or the length of the nose
was any greater than that of the Spitfire and, of course, we could sit
pretty high in the cockpit and look, virtually look over the
nose. But, usually on take-off and landing, you kept your head
out of the office on the left-hand side.
Right. And you were therefore looking down along
the ford, along the fuselage?
Along the fuselage but also kept a pretty close eye on the deck.
Right. The conversion to Kittyhawks, besides
actually hands-on flying of the aircraft, were there any other aspects
to your training at that stage, that you recall?
As far as the Kittys were concerned? No, we did a tremendous
amount of flying in that conversion time, and the instructors we had
there were chaps who had come down from 3 or 112 Squadron who had had a lot of combat experience and of course they passed it
gladly, passed it on to us. And I think most of us absorbed all
that we possibly could.
Was there much talk or specific training to do with
tactics, the tactics of aerial combat and so on, or not?
Yes. Generally the squadron flew two sections of six a piece and,
of course, the training wing, they coached us very, very much in
that. It was different formations to those we'd flown in England,
but it was a very, very good, I think a very, very good
defensive rather than offensive formation. And the fluid sixes
could be easily split up into fluid pairs.
Right.
Let's just pause for a moment.
END TAPE ONE - SIDE A
BEING TAPE ONE - SIDE B
Identification: This is Ed Stokes with Reg
Stevens, No. 3 Squadron. Tape one, side two.
Reg, I think it's interesting that you had an interview
with Bobby Gibbes during this period. Tell us about that?
Yes. When we were doing this conversion course, Gibbie came up in
what we call the 'glasshouse'. It was a station
wagon that they'd stolen from the Free French I think it was, and
Gibbie was in the back. And he had - I'm not sure whether it was
his left or his right ankle - was in plaster, and he said at the time,
'Would you like to join 3 Squadron?'. And I said, 'My very
word'. I said, 'My very word I want to', I said, 'That's
virtually why I came up here', and he had a look at my log book and he
said, 'Oh, I notice that you're below average in your air gunnery',
and I said, 'Yes'. He said, 'So was I so you'll do well in the
squadron'.
Right. That's interesting in fact because it was
at this time I think that Nicky Barr was CO. Bobby Gibbes had
been injured so he was doing a bit of kind of behind-the-scene
scouting for his old squadron it would seem.
Gibbie couldn't keep away from the squadron, that was
his complete life. But he did help Nick very, very much when
Nicky took over temporarily.
Right. And there was obviously a great shortage of
pilots. I know Nicky was speaking about the other day.
Well, just to sum up that training, we might just put down it was from
27th May to 6th June '42, and I think the record was ten hours
forty-five minutes in Kittyhawks. How adequate was that in
retrospect to prepare you for what you had to do with Kittyhawks in
combat?
Well, of course, you don't start to learn to fly until
you've done over a thousand hours. But at that particular time
we'd have taken on the whole Luftwaffe; it didn't worry
us. I think we were perhaps a little over-confident or more than
a little over-confident - very, very cocky - but we were ready for it.
Right. Well, let's go onto actually joining the
squadron. It was at Gambut and 7th June, '42 is the date.
Nicky Barr of course is the squadron leader, having taken over from
Bobby Gibbes. What was your first impression of the men of the
squadron when you arrived there?
Mmm. It was an opinion that I've never changed: they were a
very, very grand lot of boys. Not very, very much experienced as
far as air combat and flying was concerned but it was more than made
up by their enthusiasm and their respect for both Bobby and Nicky
Barr.
Mmm. Right. So there was a real bond towards
those leaders.
That bond, oddly enough, Ed, has still gone on. Even today the
bond is becoming even greater in my opinion.
Right. Well, this period of June, or basically of
June '42 was when the squadron was forced into a very rapid retreat,
numerous short operations, often more than one a day. What kinds
of operations were you involved in?
Generally we were bombing and strafing with quite a
number of aerial combats against 109s and 202s. On one occasion
I recall we took off from Gambut, Sat 1, I think it was, and we no
sooner had our wheels up than infernal German tanks started firing at
us. We didn't land back on our own strip. While we were
having a go at those tanks the whole of the squadron, the whole of the
wing actually was moving back and moving back very fast. So we
caught up and past them and landed on one of the airstrips east of
Gambut.
(5.00 The airstrips in the desert during this
period when you were literally leapfrogging back from strip to strip,
how good or bad were they as landing grounds?
They were quite good. The desert was fairly hard packed, there
wasn't much sand left. I think all the sand had been
blown away thousands of years ago. But it was very simple and we
didn't even need a strip in a lot of instances to put down.
Later on when the Americans came in we had .... I think it was
three squadrons of them came over to us, pursuit squadrons, came over
to us for experience. And we gave what we could to them.
They complained very bitterly though, that on moonlight nights they
were pretty heavily bombed and we weren't bombed. They didn't
wake up to the fact that by their putting all their old oils and
whatnots on the landing ground it stood out, oh, as black as ink, and
it stood out so very much and of course they copped the bombs.
We had no oil or covering on our strips and we were right.
Mmm. That's interesting. The oil they were
putting down was to cement the ground, was it?
No, I think it was to stop the dust rising, Ed.
That's
what I meant, to damp down the dust.
Yeah.
Desert flying, what, as you see it, were the advantages
and perhaps disadvantages of flying in a generally flat desert
environment?
Well, the first thing was that you could bomb and strafe and you're not
going to hurt any major towns because they just don't exist over
there. That was .... To my way of thinking that is a very
decided advantage. But as far as flying is
concerned, if you're knocked down, it's a darn sight easier to land in
the desert than it is to try and land on a city road.
Mmm.
Right. Or, for example, in fields in England.
You're right.
What about navigation in the desert? Was that ever
difficult in this featureless landscape, or not?
Navigation was not easy but, there again, I think we flew 'by guess and
by God' and a lot of manners. Later on I became
very interested in navigation in order to lead the boys. And we
made a pretty fair fist of it, I think. But it was still pretty
difficult, a featureless desert and we used to fly 'on the clock' as
much as fly anything.
What
do you mean by 'on the clock'?
Well, we'd know that we had a certain distance to go we knew what our
air speed would be; and we then flew on that time and just looked
around and picked up something. Invariably you could pick up
something. And in a lot of instances be a German camp.
Did you have reasonably reliable meteorological
information that would give you aspects such as wind drift and that
kind of thing, or not?
No. We used to work that out ourselves, Ed. Met. was very,
very poor in the desert but at least we had a prevailing
wind and we had a pretty fair idea of where we were.
Right. And by working it out yourself, you mean
you'd, based on a dead reckoning path and how far you deviated from
that, you could work out wind drift, could you?
Yes. On a number of occasions we flew out over the Mediterranean
for quite a considerable time and then cut into the coast and I don't
think we ever missed out on finding our target.
Right. The retreat did involve very, very rapid
movement back from airstrip to airstrip. How effective was the
coordination between the air crew and the ground crew? How
smoothly did the squadron fall back?
Oh, that was absolutely wizard. The organisation in the whole of
the wing, not only the squadron, but the whole of the
wing, was super, absolutely superb and the ground staff boys of
course, I do take my hat off to them every time. They
coordinated and the officers and the men all coordinated and worked
very, very well together.
In your recollection, was there ever any occasion when,
for example, the planes got back to a certain point to be refuelled,
maintained, whatever, to find the ground staff weren't there?
(10.00) Yes. But that was quite late in the piece when we
were going forward. We leapfrogged and
unfortunately the ground staff boys had not arrived and I think we had
one of the Americans with us, a Colonel Hogg. He was flying with
his 45th Pursuit Group boys, and he came over to me and he said,
'Steve, have you got any food?', and I said, 'Oh, I've only got some
bully beef I think', and he said, 'Oh, beef, good'. So he
started his Kittyhawk up and we put a couple of cans of bully beef on
the motor to heat them up. Pretty lousy Ed, but they enjoyed it,
better than their Spam.
Tell us about food in the desert - I haven't asked many
people about that. What were you generally living off,
breakfast, lunch, the evening meal. Whenever you could get time
to eat?
The cooks did a remarkable job, even though they didn't have a great
deal to work with. We had bully beef, and bully
beef, M&V or meat and vegetables, and I think that was about
all. The way the boys knocked it up, mixed with a bit of sand
and rubbish I suppose, was quite good.
One other aspect that I think would be interesting to
ask about is your view of the Kittyhawk as a fighting aircraft as
against the German planes you were coming up against, what was your
estimation of the Kittyhawk as against the German aircraft?
Up to about ten, twelve thousand feet the Kitty would hold
its own. It would out-turn the 109s or the Macchi 202s, but it
was so very rare for us to see the Huns on our own level;
usually they were two or three thousand feet above us and with that
cannon through the nose it was, oh, pretty frightening. You'd
see that trickle of smoke coming out of the 109 and you'd think, 'God,
struth, where is it going to hit me?'. So the Kitty as a fighter
was not in the same street as the 109.
Right. I just want to ask now about one incident
that apparently is quite off the official record, obviously most
unfortunate, but through no fault of No. 3 Squadron. This is the
incident, and the date we have as 11th June 1942, when you described
how the squadron actually shot up some Indian troops, Indian Allied
troops. How did this develop?
Mmm. Very, very obvious that the bomb line that the intelligence
bods had given us was incorrect, because Nicky Barr was leading the
squadron at the time and we went over and we bombed and strafed until we
heard Nicky call up, 'Don't strafe any more. Don't
strafe any more'. The reason that he did that was that there was
no anti-aircraft fire coming from the troops that we were doing
over. And Nicky did an absolutely marvellous thing then.
He landed amongst these, this Indian division and being in the desert
- as I mentioned earlier - he could put it down on the deck with no
problem at all. But he landed and he apologised to the division
there. Now I think that was a very, very mighty thing and that
is typically Nicky Barr.
Yes. I mean, he might well have received a hostile
reception. Do you have any idea of the actual casualties?
No, I'm afraid I don't, Ed. Even had they come out, I don't think
we would have been permitted to mention them.
Was that incident to your knowledge ever pursued in any
way, in terms of reprimands against the people who'd provided the
incorrect information?
I don't think there were actual reprimands against them, but they would
have been told to pull their socks up and give us proper
information.
Right. Well, moving on a little bit, in fact I
think it was the next day, 12th June. This was the day your
aircraft was hit in its hydraulic system. How do you remember
that operation beginning? What were sent out to do and how did
the hit occur?
We were sent out on a bombing, a dive-bombing and
strafing show. The bombs we carried were 250 pounders with a
twenty-three inch nose rod that protrudes from the nose of the
bomb. We went out and I think it was an Italian crowd we were
bombing and I got a whack in the hydraulics and electrics with, I
think it was a forty mill. - I don't know for sure. At any rate,
on the way back the motor started to cough a wee bit and didn't sound
too bright. So I went to put my wheels down and there was this
blare in my ears to say that the wheels had not locked down. And
it was very, very obvious then that the hydraulics had been shot
up. So I tried to retract the wheels again - I think they were
retracted a wee bit - at any rate, I tried to make the aerodrome, but
after the blare in my ears I turned to port, turned left to port, and
thought, 'Well, I'll have to put her down'. And I was only,
what, two or three hundred feet above the deck then and I looked and I
saw the ground staff boys all standing near their tents and waving,
and then the next moment off they went like shot rabbits. And I
put this aeroplane down and the bomb rolled away. At the time,
of course, I didn't know there was an infernal bomb was on there, but
the boys did, that's why they scarpered.
(15.00) Well, that was obviously most
fortunate. If you had known the bomb was still aboard, what do
you think your .... What do you think you would have done?
Oh Ed, I think that had I had height I'd have thought about jettisoning
it and baling out. But not knowing - this was not a
manual manner of dropping bombs, it was electrical and it was not a
good system - but whether or not, I don't know whether I'd have baled
out or whether I'd have .... Had I known the bomb was still on
there I would have baled out, yes.
Mmm. Right. Well, two days later you were saying
there was a tragic incident, a similar landing, but this time the
pilot didn't survive. I think his name was Ross Brighton.
Yes. Ross took off and he obviously had a bit of motor trouble,
put his wheels down and went to land on one of the
satellite strips, and the nose rod on this damn bomb hit piled-up sand
that was around the camel thorn there and poor old Ross just
.... He became very deceased.
Just a correction incidentally, that was 15th June, the
date we have for that fatality. It's a hard thing to talk about
I'm sure, Reg, but looking back at your own close escape and then the
death of your fellow pilot, how shaken were you by events such as
that?
I don't think we were very, very shaken, Ed. We had
come to accept that being shot down and losing pilots had become part
and parcel of the whole of the action. We regretted very much of
course that our friends had gone down, and for a long, long time we
hoped and perhaps prayed that they'd walk back or become POWs.
But a very, very .... It is very traumatic.
How hard was it to get back into an aircraft after an
incident such as yours, perhaps even more so after you'd seen what
happened to Ross?
Has never seem to have worried me, Ed. I mean I'm not being blasé
when I say that but I've never been frightened;
perhaps I've been concerned but I've never been frightened and I've
never neglected to do what I think I had to do.
Right. Well going on a little bit, for the record,
these are just some facts that typify the kind of the intensity of the
work, I guess. July '42, you yourself flew thirty-one sorties
and this was this very intense period of the retreat. August
'42, the squadron had been pushed quite a way back I think, almost to
the Delta. August 23rd, you were shot down. Mmm, what had
you been sent to do on that particular operation?
What did I what, Ed?
What had you - the squadron - gone out to do on that
operation?
Oh, we'd gone out in the very, very early morning show. Again,
dive-bombing and strafing and I know it was fairly early because
I was knocked down at ten minutes to nine that morning, and in flames
which wasn't terribly nice.
Just going back a tiny bit, do you remember how the
action developed? Were you, for example, hit by ground fire, or
were you being attacked from the air?
No. I remember we were coming home. We were well on the way
home and I saw this 109 coming down behind me and I turned into him, and
I could see the smoke dribbling out of his white nose and then, bang,
and I did a very, very quick flick roll. He'd hit
me in the right aileron and also behind my cockpit and set the
aeroplane on fire. So it was just a matter of get down, and get
down pretty quickly.
Mmm. The whole thing of fire in the air is
something that almost every pilot I've spoken to says was held in
complete dread, obviously very little time elapsed before you baled
out, could you think back to tell us what was going through your mind?
(20.00) Yes. I thought, 'Well, I'm on fire. I must get
out'. So I pulled my straps from the Sutton harness,
put my left leg out onto the port main plane, still hung onto the
stick and I was ready to jump, and I could smell this burning
cloth. And the first thing that went through my mind was that my
parachute's on fire. Well, actually it wasn't; it was my
shirt that was burning off. At any rate, I put it down very,
very fast.
You
decided then not to bale out?
Well, I couldn't bale out thinking my 'chute was on fire. So I
put it down on the deck and it landed very fast, and I was nearly shot
by the New Zealanders who came out to pick me up.
From when you made that decision, Reg, not to bale out,
to .... When you hit the ground - touch down - how long do you
think that would have been?
Perhaps it sounded like some minutes, but I think it would only be, at the very most, half a minute, Ed.
Right.
So you must already have been quite low?
Ah yes, I was low and going down; I had no power left.
I think you were saying, having got onto the ground, the
plane exploded. I think you yourself were burning?
No. I ran from the aircraft with my 'chute, and perhaps I would have been fifty to sixty yards away and threw the 'chute on the deck and sat down on it, and then the oxy tanks in the Kitty blew, which blew it to pieces. The most unusual thing was I hadn't been sitting there longer than it appeared about a minute and an old Arab came along with a - I'm not sure whether it was a camel - no it wasn't a camel, it was a donkey. And he looked at me, and he looked at this burning aeroplane, and I think he meant to say, 'Is that yours?', as if it could have been anyone else's. There was no-one else for miles around until the New Zealanders came.
Yes, it must have been a strange contrast between an ancient way of
life and this sort of madness of modern technology.
You were picked up, they got you back to the squadron, what happened
then?
When they picked me up, one of the New Zealander soldiers was standing
in the back with a Tommy gun pointed at me, and I looked up and could
see the flash of their emblem and I said, 'Oh, thank
heavens for the New Zealanders'. And he said, 'So and so, and so
and so', he said, 'If you'd have been a so and so German you'd be dead
now'. Any rate, they picked me up and took me back, fed me, gave
me a new shirt, rang the squadron and later on that day the squadron
came over and, I think, Col Greaves the adjutant came over and picked
me up and took me back to the squadron.
You were saying that after that I think you spent two or
three days at a rest camp on the Mediterranean sent down by Bobby
Gibbes. Did that kind of peaceful interlude help you get over
that very close escape?
I think it must have Ed, because down on the
Med[iterranean] we were under canvas if I remember rightly. It
was beautiful weather and we'd do a bit of swimming - only had a
couple of days there - but we had a cook who had come from the
squadron, a very good cook, and he seemed to look after us very, very
well. And I went back with some regrets perhaps, back to the
squadron after a couple of days.
From your log book we know you flew again on the 27th,
the 30th and the 31st August. How important do you think was it
for pilots who had been shot down to get back in the air pretty
quickly?
Ed, there's stories go around about people who have been knocked down
or have had bad accidents and this, that and the other thing, and their
CO has said, 'Oh get back in the air as quick as you can', but I don't know whether that's, that is factual. As I said, I
have been concerned on quite a number of occasions on flying and I
don't think that in the long run it meant a thing to me. It
didn't seem to worry me.
Right. Well, after the end of the retreat there
was a loose period I know, and September '42 we have the squadron
being stood down for a time. Did you get any leave then?
Did you get time to get right away from it all, or not?
That was when we were back in the Delta. Yes, we used to go on
leave in Alexandria which was only about, oh, ten or
fifteen miles or perhaps kilometres - I'm not sure whether it was
kilometres or miles - and we had overnight leave, not day leave.
We still had to go back to the squadron but it was a very, very good
and peaceful rest period.
(25.00) Mmm. Did men ...? Did you all
enjoy the sights? What were the main diversions?
Oh, I don't think people were terribly, terribly interested in the
sights. There was one sight there that I think everyone saw and
everyone knew: it was the only virgin in Egypt. It
was a big eighteen foot statue in bronze.
How much did men, you know, men who were not married,
how much frequenting of brothels and so on was there in your
recollection?
Not a great deal, Ed. There was some, but I think
opportunity was a great thing and the opportunities weren't there,
plus the fact that there were a lot of soldiers around the area and
our boys, no, they didn't, they didn't frequent them .... Not to
any great extent that I know of.
Right. Well, let's move back to flying, Reg.
October '42 saw the squadron flying again - this is in the period
prior to Alamein. Just to get some figures down because I think
they're interesting, these are from Reg's log book, October you flew
thirteen sorties, November 15, December 19. What were the main
kinds of operations in your recollection?
Generally what we had been doing all along the line:
reconnaissance, armed reconnaissance, dive-bombing, strafing, a fair
amount of aerial combat at the same time, although at
that particular time Jerry was starting to go back and feel the
restraints that he had on his aircraft. Not a great number were
coming over from Italy or Sicily. Also the Navy had been very,
very active in sinking whatever ships had left Sicily.
Mmm. That's most interesting, Reg. The
formations that you were flying during this period - I know there were
changes during the whole period in the Middle East - how do you
remember formation flying? What were the most common formations?
Our squadron, in fact the whole of our wing, used to fly
two lots of sixes in fluid pairs with a leader, a yellow one on his
right, a blue one on his left and the number twos behind him. We
stuck to that right through until after the Sicilian campaign and I
think - I'm looking back now with hindsight - it was more a defensive
formation rather than offensive.
Mmm.
Tell us what you mean by fluid pairs.
Fluid pairs: there are two flying. One flying directly
behind the other so that you can be sent. If the leader
of the gaggle can easily send, say, one pair out to intercept or to
strafe or to bomb and he also controls the fluid pairs up in top
cover.
I see, right. Mmm. It was during October Reg
that you shot down I think a 202. What's your recollection of
that encounter?
Well, I was still fairly new to the squadron and we'd done this
particular job and I saw this fellow, he actually came up from
under us and climbed in front of me, and I was just very, very
fortunate and pulled the nose up and gave him a squirt and he went
down. But, oh, there was no actual fighting as far as I was
concerned in that one.
Right. After that kind of episode, or perhaps
during it, of course it all happened very quickly, was your thought
that you were shooting down a plane; that you were shooting down
a man; or both?
No. I'm afraid I didn't have very many thoughts of it at
all. I thought, 'Oh, that's one less of the
cows'. But, no, I had no worries about whether it was an
aeroplane or a man. Later on I thought a bit about it but it
didn't worry me.
Right. Do you think there was an element in what
you as a squadron had to do? I don't mean you personally.
Was there an element of hate against the Germans or was it a fairly
impersonal kind of combat?
No, it was pretty lot of hate, Ed.
END TAPE ONE, SIDE B
BEGIN TAPE TWO, SIDE A
Identification: This is Edward Stokes with Reg
Stevens, No. 3 Squadron. Tape two, side one.
Reg was shot down on numerous occasions and we're just
going to talk about some aspects to deal with this, and I'm just
reading from a statement made on 19th May 1981 by Reg to his doctor,
an account of different shootings-down. These are dates:
31.12.41, on the Isle of Man whilst landing a Spitfire the starboard
tyre blew out, the aircraft slid off the sealed runway onto
water-sodden grass and somersaulted on its back - there are some
further details I won't read out because we've already talked them
through; 12.6.42, my aircraft was hit by enemy 40 mm ground fire
and crash-landed in the desert; 29.6.42, following hydraulic
failure in the undercarriage and being unable to get the wheels down I
crash-landed on our desert strip; 23.8.42, I was shot down in
flames by ME-109 enemy fighter, crashed landed in the desert - the
episode we've just talked about; 3.8.43, in Sicily I was shot
down by enemy ground fire, crash-landed in an olive tree near Mount
Etna; 9.5.44, back in Australia whilst flying a Spitfire the
motor blew up and I crash-landed on the road near Merbein, Mildura,
Victoria. After cessation of hostilities I returned to New
Guinea to my pre-war post with the administration and was retired from
there on medical grounds due to my back complaint in 1952. Reg,
I think you were saying that the retirement from the administration in
New Guinea was because you couldn't complete journeys overland and so
on?
I'd done a fair amount of patrolling as a senior inspector of native
labour and I found that I could not walk the distances
that were required. So the Public Service Commissioner
suggested, or recommended, that I be medically boarded, which I was,
and I was retired, superannuated from the Service.
Right. Well, let's actually go back to the war
period. It really is a remarkable catalogue of being shot down
and surviving to tell the tale. Fear, I imagine, must in some
element have been present in the life of a fighter pilot. How do
you remember that? Was that something that was just a general
thing carrying all the way through your war experience, or was it
something that came and went?
No. Ed, it's rather a peculiar sensation but,
without being blasé, I don't think I was ever frightened. I was
concerned, certainly concerned, but I was more concerned over some of
the other boys who perhaps had not had the same experience I
had. But I do know of people who, after being shot down, were
most reluctant to fly again and in many instances were sent back for
additional training and perhaps counselling.
The concern that you expressed yourself feeling
sometimes, was that most evident before or during operations?
I think at the start of any operational flight there was a certain
trepidation .... Well, we know that the ground staff
boys objected rather strongly to changing the wheels - the rear wheel
on the Kittyhawk - because of the pilots always urinating on it just
prior to take-off. So that must have been some type of internal
worry or concern.
Were there any other physical symptoms of fear besides,
as you said, urinating?
No, I'd say no, definitely not, Ed.
No
sweating or nausea, things like that?
No, no.
What about pilots amongst themselves? Were men
about to talk about their concerns, or not?
(5.00) Yes. After a job, and especially if it had been a
pretty sticky-do, one the pilots when they came into the mess - we had a
pilots' mess, sergeant pilots, warrant officer pilots and officer pilots
were all together - and there was a very decided sign of
relief on all the pilots that they'd at least got back this time.
For men who were particularly overwrought, who could
they turn to?
They turned to our doctor, Doctor Tim Stone, who was a grand man and
wonderful fellow. Tim could pick out those who were
a little bit dicey, but he did it in such a way that no-one else
seemed to know about it. It was nothing to come back and find
one or perhaps two of the pilots had been sent back to base, but no
explanation given, none required. We knew that people did crack
up a wee bit under the strain but it was accepted. It was part
and parcel of the squadron.
That's interesting. So there was no element of
judgment on the part of men who could cope against those who perhaps
couldn't.
No, no. To the contrary. The ones who had
had a lot of experience, for example, Keith Kildey and Danny Boardman,
Charlie Cowd, they were the first to lend a hand to those who were
struggling, and I take my hat off to those boys.
Your own record was certainly quite remarkable I would
have thought, in the number of escapes you did have from very dicey
situations. How much did fatalism play a part in keeping you
going? Was there a kind of belief that if your number's up it's
there and that's it? Did that help you through, or not?
I think I might have been born under a lucky star.
I should have been knocked over on quite a number of occasions, but
just luck must come into it. Certainly there was a wee bit of
skill, but skill doesn't come until you get experience and that
experience was pretty hard to buy on occasions.
What about thoughts for your family back in
Australia? How much did they come to the fore when you were in
these very difficult situations?
Not while we were flying, not so much, but after we
would come home and especially at night-time in the mess when we had
no electric light, just lamps, and we'd play cards or write letters,
and the thoughts were never far from us of our home people.
Following responses by Mrs Stevens.
I thought it would just be interesting to include the
perspective of a woman and a wife in this story. Of course not
many of the pilots were married, Mrs Stevens, but you'd married Reg
just before the war. Aside from the issue of combat danger which
we might come to in a minute, what were the general problems, do you
think, that a woman faced when her husband went off to war?
Mrs Stevens: Well I had a little boy who was very difficult,
because he was a very active child and very strong, self-willed and it
worried me to a great extent because I was thinking of my
husband all the time and I didn't know how to manage things because
I'd always been, he'd always done everything for me, looked after me
and spoilt me. I missed him terrifically and it wore me down in
the end.
Mmm. There must have been, I can see, a great deal
of loneliness in bringing up a child and I think you were living
yourself with a sister who had a .... Her husband was away too?
Mrs Stevens: Yes. The two sisters married to the two
brothers and they went away within a week of one
another. And we'd always been very close and I looked after the
house. She was still working, she had no family. But I
think that having her coming home .... If I'd been on my own it
would have been worse.
The letters that came back from Reg no doubt told of
some of these escapes, although I'd imagine they were sometimes made
less horrific than perhaps they were in reality. How did the
stories of his fighting affect you?
Mrs Stevens: Well, he didn't tell me very much.
I heard most of the things through the newspaper clippings. He
was rather inclined not to let me know.
To
shield you from what was going on.
Mrs Stevens: Yes, to shield me from worrying more than I
was.
That's interesting because I think Reg was saying that
some of the newspaper reports in fact were somewhat exaggerated.
Mrs Stevens: Yes, I think they are, well I didn't
realise at the time that they were.
So you were getting this second-hand information.
Did you get any information officially from the air force about these
crashes and so on?
(10.00) Mrs Stevens: No, never. Never heard anything at all. Well, it was just as well because they would
have been frightful to have even been told it.
I think you were saying that things did rather build up
and at some point at least you suffered some kind of nervous
breakdown?
Mrs Stevens: Yes, I did. Well, he'd been overseas
a long while then and apparently all the worry just had caused it.
What
help did you get then?
Mrs Stevens: Well, I was under a very good doctor and I seemed to
be okay after his treatment, but I've always been a nervous
type and of course I worried all the time.
Was there ever any assistance to your doctor or to
yourself from the air force, or from any people who could counsel
wives left alone about the things their husbands were going through or
not?
Mrs Stevens: No, no, nothing. Nothing at
all.
At
all?
Mrs Stevens: No, nothing.
So basically it was a question of being looked after by
a good doctor?
Mrs Stevens: That's right. It was the good doctor and my
family that sort of helped me.
Right. Well that's really what I wanted to ask
you, unless there's something else you feel you'd like to add about
the whole, you know, the whole thing you went through of being left
alone in Australia.
Mrs Stevens: No, I just think that I was very lucky that I had a
father and a mother and a .... My eldest sister was
wonderful. She used to take the little boy every weekend and
give me - on the Saturdays - and give him little trips, to give me a
break. Because, you know, a child of - how old was he, I suppose
he was two wasn't he - about two is very difficult and I did enjoy
.... I think I was very lucky. I had a marvellous family
and Reg's family were also very helpful with me.
Right. Well, that's most interesting. We
might perhaps leave it there.
Continuation of interview with Reg Stevens.
This is moving on again. Reg, the first half of
1943, January '43, Tripoli was captured. February, March, April
- this is in the period leading up to when the squadron reaches
Tunisia in the end of April '43. What's your recollection of
that period?
It was a time of great activity, Ed. We cooperated very closely
with the army and especially with the New Zealanders; we virtually
adopted them. And we had a lot of successes; we lost a
number of boys but generally we were on top most of the
time.
Right. Do you have any recollection of the general
living situation as you moved on towards Tripoli and then on to
Tunisia?
The living ...?
Living
conditions?
Oh, living conditions weren't terribly good mainly because
the Italians .... We occupied camps that the Italians had
vacated as we were going forward, and they weren't the cleanest people
in the world. And I know as far, for myself, the first time in
my life I was lousy, and I resented it. I resented it very
much. When I went to the doctor at that time - I forget who he
was now - I said, 'Look, don't laugh Jenks because what I'm going to
tell you is humiliating'. And he said, 'What's the matter,
Steve; what's the matter, Steve?', and I said, 'I'm lousy', and he
roared. And he said, 'You and 300-odd bods in the squadron,
you're all lousy'. So that was an indication of living.
Right. That must have been pretty uncomfortable
I'd imagine when you were up in the air?
I wasn't so bad up in the air I suppose, but I think we
had too much to think of then. But I know when we finally got
into one of the places there I took over a house - well it was a house
that - and it had a very, very beautiful swimming pool, what I thought
was a swimming pool. So I stepped out of my lousy clothes and
into this big swimming pool and it was only later on that I found that
that was the water supply for the whole of the township.
(Laughs.) Well, I hope not too many people
suffered. Mmm, Reg, to turn to a different aspect I want to talk
a little bit about promotion and so on. As a pilot officer you'd
been awarded the DFC, I think recommended for it by Bobby Gibbes -
this is going back a way - and later you received a Bar to that DFC
when you were in Sicily. You'd been commissioned in a sense in
November '42 but it actually took about six months for the commission
to come through. You were saying that you weren't back-paid for
that period. Was there any resentment on the part of Australian
airmen in the Middle East that administrative routines and so on were
a little bit loose, a little bit slack and things such as promotion
pay didn't come through as quickly as they might have?
(15.00) Well, I know as far as the other two boys who were
commissioned at the same time as myself, that was Gordon Jones and - I'm
not sure - I think it was Norm Caldwell, at any rate, this commissioning
was not back-dated and there was a fair amount of
resentment because, in actual fact, we had been officers flying for
six months but still being paid NCO rates. Not that the money
meant so very, very much, we couldn't spend it in the blue there, but
it was wrong and I still maintain that it was wrong. And that we
should have received our commissions retrospective.
Was
there any agitation to get that changed, or not?
Not as far as I know, Ed.
Well, just to add a few other details. The 13th
May '43, you were officially made up to a pilot officer and became a
flight commander. The 19th June '43 you became, were promoted to
squadron leader and, in fact, took over to command No. 3 Squadron
after Brian Eaton. Just to talk about some issues of rank and so
on. The relationship between the ground crew and the air crew in
No. 3 Squadron, how close a relationship was that?
It was a very close relationship. There's not one of those ground
staff boys would have signed to say that an aircraft was okay unless it
was really okay. If there was any doubt about it
the pilot would be told. But we found them absolutely
magnificent chaps and they'd work all night to get an aircraft on
line. I know my own fitter and rigger, and John was a chappie I
knew up in New Guinea pre-war, and he worked on my aeroplane and I
knew that I could go out and I'd come home, God willing.
Thank you. The situation between officers and men
in No. 3 Squadron, both ground crew and air crew, but looking at the
officers as against the men, how close a sort of general relationship
was there when you were out in the field in combat situation or were
there .... Was there the distance of calling men, 'Sir',
saluting and these kinds of things?
No, Ed. We had a pilots' mess and irrespective of the youngest
and newest pilot, we all messed together. There was
.... The only person who was called 'Sir' was the CO and I think
he resented it a bit on occasions. But as far as the others it
was all on christian name, and the NCO pilots relied as much on the
officer pilots as the officer pilots relied on the NCOs. And it
was nothing to see our squadron go out led by a sergeant pilot or a
flight sergeant pilot with half a dozen officers flying with
him. But he was the number one; he was leading the
squadron. And that was the thoughts and that was the general -
what shall we say - the general ...
Pattern?
... pattern right throughout our flying career with 3.
In that kind of situation where, for example, a sergeant
was leading a flight that had amongst it a number of pilot officers,
et cetera, or more senior officers, would there ever have been any
question in the air of his authority being challenged or not?
Definitely not. The CO of the squadron would not have appointed a
sergeant pilot or a NCO pilot to lead a gaggle unless he was absolutely
convinced that that fellow was sufficiently experienced and he had the
know-how to take the boys out and bring them home.
The relationship between a ground crew of a particular
pilot, was that a first name relationship or would they have called an
officer 'Sir'?
No. The CO was the only one - there were exceptions of
course. Some of the ground staff boys would call the officers
'Sir' but that was very, very rare and usually it was 'G'day Tom' or
'G'day Harry' and 'David, what are you doing?' and that was the general pattern right throughout the whole squadron.
Right. You yourself were promoted from being a
sergeant pilot to a pilot officer and then on to a squadron leader I
think more rapidly than anyone else on record. Did that pose any
problems, or not?
Not as far as I was concerned. I had the complete
backing of all the pilots and perhaps I was a wee bit more experienced
or had spent more time in the air than the majority of them had.
But they were absolutely one hundred per cent behind me on every
occasion and I had no problems with them.
(20.00) Right. Well, let's actually look in
some detail, Reg, at your period as CO. The dates were 19th June
'43 through to 16th August '43. What was the main duty of the
commanding officer?
To ensure that the squadron was ready for any
contingency whatsoever; to ensure that the training was right to
the very, very tip of perfection - I don't think we ever reached
perfection but we did reach fairly close to it - and that was mainly
because of the cooperation of all pilots within not only our squadron
but right within the wing.
How much as commanding officer of the squadron were you
involved in the day-to-day mechanics of supplies getting to the right
place, all this kind of thing, or was that generally completely
delegated to other people?
In the main it was delegated through the equipment officers and the
engineering officers. I did find it a good idea to at least go
down to the orderly room once or twice a week. But the adjutant -
we had a very, very competent adjutant - and that's all
there was to it. He looked after the basics, I looked after the
flying personnel.
Right. Just to ask a question about the flying,
it's a point that a few people have made, some people have suggested
that in No. 3 Squadron, as against other squadrons, there was much
more of a group attitude to flying, that individuals were less likely
to go off on their own and perhaps get the very high scores of some of
the aces of certain other squadrons. Do you see that being the
case or not?
I don't think we had a sufficiently good offensive aeroplane to do
that. And generally because of the training that these boys had
received and the pep talk perhaps from the senior members of the
squadron, they had no intention. They didn't want to
leave the formation to go out on their own. They knew that if
there was someone to be shot down, that the CO or the leader of the
gaggle would say, 'Okay, Blue 1 or Blue 2, go down and get so and
so'. But that's as simple as that, Ed.
Right. So there was a large element of
self-preservation involved in it?
I suppose self-preservation but also pride within the formation.
Right. Moving on to June '43, after you'd become
commanding officer, Reg, I think you were operating out of Zuara
south-east of Tunis. I think there was some training pre
.... Prior to the Sicilian operations?
Oh, we had quite a decent stint of a break - when I say the break, we
had a fourteen-day party which included a lot of grog which I brought
back from Algiers - but as soon as that was finished and
it was a matter of nose to the grindstone again and we did a
tremendous amount of flying, formation flying, shadow shooting, both
tactical and dive-bombing. Really it was good and it was rather
... I was very, very proud to see the manner in which those boys had
done the job that I asked them to do, in that I didn't do it on my
own. We had flight commanders who assisted very much, good
fellows all, and they were the instrument of getting those pilots
together as a fighting and flying unit.
Right. That's very clear. On 6th July there
was an operation that I think was extremely secret, confidential, via
Malta on to Sicily. Could you tell us how that developed and
what your role in it was?
Yes. On that particular night the group captain,
Group Captain Jack Darwin, he called me over to his tent and he said,
'Steve, this is a matter of the greatest secrecy. I want you to
take a composite squadron of twelve over to Malta, where you will
refuel bomb up and go and bomb Biscari and Sicily.' And I said,
'Righto, well who's to go from the other squadrons?' - there were five
squadrons in the wing. Anyhow, I took three from 3
Squadron: myself, John Hobsonhook and Brian Harris - Brian
Harris was one of the flight commanders.
(25.00) Now the unusual thing was that we were absolutely sworn to
secrecy and that no-one was to know, apart from the pilots that I was
briefing that evening, where we were going, what we were doing. At
any rate, we went over to Malta, and landed at Luqa, refuelled and bombed up, then we had a top cover of about
eighty Spitfires. So we had no worries about weaving or having
to look out for 109s or 202s. We went in and we bombed Biscari
and came back, landed back to Luqa then refuelled and on to, back to
Zuara where the ground staff boys were very, very interested to know
where we'd been. And they inspected the wheels, the tyres and
they said, 'Oh yes, it's something white. We think they've been
to Malta', but no-one knew about that for many, many years after.
Mmm. That's an interesting story. A few days
later, 9th July, the squadron itself moved to Malta. What were
the difficulties of getting the squadron across the Mediterranean to
Malta?
There was a tremendous amount of preparation and there again
we can only say thank you to the officers and men who did the
waterproofing of our three-ton trucks, and all those vehicles and they
did a mighty job. As far as the pilots were concerned, we knew
that we were going into an established mess at Luqa or down in Sliema
but I still look back and I think, 'By Jove, those boys were
absolutely marvellous to do in such a short time what it would have
taken a normal squadron weeks to do', they did it in days and we
landed virtually as a going squadron on Malta. The same thing
happened in Sicily.
How many days did you actually have to prepare for the
move?
Oh, I think we were given about a fortnight, Ed.
That's a fortnight over and above our training, the very intense
training session that we went through. It might have been a little bit
less than that but they did the job.
The shifting of all the squadron's transports, I assume
tents, personal baggage, let alone all the aircraft and maintenance
gear, spares and so on, how did they get across to Malta?
By ship. By landing craft. And, oh, there
was no problem at all. The skies were absolutely full of our own
aircraft. The Mediterranean was full of battleships and
cruisers, destroyers, frigates; you name it, they were
there. It would have been a very, very cocky German who would
come out to try and stop them.
Right. You were saying you moved to established
airfields. What was the quality of the airstrips you moved
to? Had they been knocked around at all, or were they in good
condition?
Oh, they had been .... Over the past several years
they'd really been knocked about but the maintenance, the - I suppose
you'd call them the airstrip maintenance bods - they did an absolutely
marvellous job and it looked like crushed coral that had been rolled
into the runways. I think there were five main strips on
Malta. We were on Luqa main and then there was Luqa Sat 1 and
Sat 2 and several smaller ones. And in addition there was, down
at Kalafrana there was a big seaplane base but we did not patron there
of course. But we had no problems at all. Maintenance had
been put on and quite a number of our own bods had by that time come
in and doing the servicing of our own aircraft.
Right.
END TAPE TWO, SIDE A
BEGIN TAPE TWO - SIDE B
Identification: This is Ed Stokes with Reg
Stevens. Tape two, side two.
Reg, the squadron was based at Malta for about ten days
or in fact I think exactly ten days. What's your recollection of
the squadron's operations during that time?
Mainly the strafing and bombing of Sicily. The
Germans still had a lot of aircraft fighters and some bombers on
Sicily and we tried to wipe them out as we were fully aware, or some
of us were fully aware that an invasion of Sicily was imminent.
I was very, very proud to think that an Australian squadron had gone
into Malta, an Australian fighter squadron. A complete squadron
had gone in as the nucleus of the invasion perhaps of Europe through
France. I was proud to take the boys in. I'm very, very
proud of the squadron itself and I'm extremely proud of the work that
they did.
Well, it was 19th July I think that you in fact flew
over to Sicily and I think you were based, used two airstrips in
Sicily. What was the general nature of your role there?
Well, the first thing was that we had to become established, Ed.
Our strip was twelve hundred feet that had been ripped
out of a vineyard, and that vineyard had been booby-trapped by the
Germans and the Italians during their retreat from it, and we were not
very happy about that. We lost several boys, not killed, but we
had them wounded from these infernal booby-traps. It was rather
lovely to go into a strip where there was green grass and grapes
growing and trees growing. The whole of the war took a very
different aspect and we thought, 'Ah, at least we're getting somewhere
now. We've beaten them in the desert; we're beaten them off
Malta; we've beating them off Sicily', and the next step was to
be Italy. So, Ed, you can probably understand how terribly proud
I was to have taken them, to have been associated with the squadron
and to finish up taking the first all-Australian squadron to Malta and
to Sicily.
Yes I certainly can, Reg. And I can understand the
pleasure of getting away from the sort of to-ing and fro-ing in the
desert. The wing that you were attached to which I think Nicky
Barr previously commanded in the desert, were you still attached to
that wing here or not?
Yes, 239 Wing came through completely. Nicky
wasn't in charge of the wing. He was CO of 3 at one stage, but
the wing was commanded by Group Captain Jack Darwin, a very fine chap
which I have the greatest admiration for him. Unfortunately he
was shot down a little later. But the wing itself consisting of
the five squadrons, including a South African squadron, two English
composite squadrons and two Australia squadrons, 3 and 450, and there
would only be a very thin line between the five squadrons.
Right. Well, just moving on. It was 16th
August when you were posted to 451 Squadron, left No. 3, what are your
memories of your last days with the squadron?
(5.00) With 3, I think one of being terribly proud not only of the
squadron boys but of their achievements. I was a little reluctant
going to 451 after the operations of 3 [Squadron] and after, what, over
twelve months, fourteen months with the squadron.
I'd seen a lot of them come, I'd seen a lot of them go, and all I can
really say was, 'Thank you very, very much for being such wonderful
bods'.
Right. Yes, I can imagine the feeling. Let's
just go on briefly to the period later in the war for you. We
have to treat this rather more briefly. You did go to 451 in the
Delta, that was August '43 to January '44, as CO. What was the
main function of the squadron while you were there?
I was posted to 451 in order to convert them from army co-op to
a compact efficient fighter squadron. They'd been flying
Hurricanes, they were clapped-out Hurricanes they were too, and the
enthusiasm 451 boys was very, very low. Their morale was very,
very low. They appeared to have been left out of the war.
Some of them were terribly, terribly eager to get into a fighting war
and not just finish up flying convoy patrols as they had been
doing. It wasn't easy to reform that squadron, but when I told
them that we were to get Spitfires to replace their Hurricanes their
enthusiasm went up. Oh, it was really incredible to see, and
once the Spitties started to come through - certainly they were only
Spitfires initially but they were still Spitties and the boys loved
them - and, as I say, their enthusiasm was absolutely sky-high.
So from then on I had no trouble whatsoever in converting them from
their Hurricanes to these lovely little pets that I loved so much.
Right. Thank you very much. Well, it was
January '44 that you did then go back to Australia. I'd imagine
that must have been delightful to have been reunited with your family?
It really was Ed, yes. The first thing I did, in landing in
Fremantle, was to ring Nan .... Oh no, I rang the next-door
neighbour and said, 'Look, I'll be phoning you at nine o'clock
in the morning' or some stupid hour because when the phone call came
through it was about five o'clock I think in Western Australia and I'm
not an early riser and, oh, I hated it. But it was delightful to
talk to her, and whilst I loved Western Australia very much I was
terribly keen to get on the train and get home, which I did after
probably a week on the train. It was great to see them all;
great to see my family. And I had a lot of experiences to tell
them about too.
Yes. Well, that must be true surely. I know
you went on to Mildura OTU where Peter Jeffrey was CO. What was
your general view of the air force in Australia? Having come
back from the Middle East where you'd been in a very active situation,
what was your general view of the quality of the people running the
air force in Australia?
Peter [sic] ... I don't think I should answer that question because,
oh, it's a difficult one in that I don't want to tread on people's toes,
but everything was so very, very different. There
was spit and polish which of course none of us were very happy
about. But the main advantage was that we had so many of the old
desert boys at Mildura, and it was great to see them. People who
had come home months and months before - perhaps eight, nine, ten
months before I did.
Do
you think they were used to their best capacity?
At that time the war was fast running out here in Japan. The
Americans had obviously taken over and the Australian airmen were to
take a very, very minor part.
Right. Well, let's just go on to the end. At
the end of the war I know you were seconded to ANA to be with them for
a short time. Peace was declared. When peace was finally
declared, what was your overwhelming emotion, thought? How do
you remember that?
(10.00) My major thoughts were for my two brothers who were POWs
of the Nips, that was primary. My second was, when can I get back
to Papua New Guinea, and a third was perhaps a little thanksgiving for
coming through it.
Right. Well, I know you did go back to Papua New
Guinea for some time and then, of course, back to Australia again in
the early 1950s. Looking back on it all, looking back on your
period as a pilot in the air force, how had the experience changed you
and had it been for the better or for the worse?
Oh, a bit of a moot point. Some people say that I
came home fairly arrogant. Others, that I talked like a
Pommy. I have no doubt that I've changed. The change was
so gradual though that I can't really put my finger on any major
points. It was gradual. I used to drink a fair bit and
play up fairly wild. Looking back on it now I don't see even how
I could have been wild, Ed, because, you know, I'm a very respectable
sort of bod now.
Easing back into civilian life, Reg, was that difficult
or not?
Yes, very. I loathed it. Although I loved the islands, I
always had loved the islands, but I loathed the thought of being
semi-regimented and having to fill in blasted report forms and this,
that and the other thing, and not being able to
virtually do what I had to do but I wanted to do what somebody else
wanted me to do even though ... I did quite well up in the
islands. I loved my stint up there.
That's interesting, Reg. I would have thought in
some ways life in the air force would have been more regimented than
civilian life.
Not in the desert, Ed. Out here in Australia, yes, it was very
much so regimented with parades and this, that and the other thing which
I didn't like. But in the desert, no, it was the happy-go-lucky
fellows. They knew the job they had to do. They were proud
to be in a position of being able to do it. And I was terribly
proud and I'm still terribly proud of the squadron.
Right. Well, thank you for telling us all
that. One last thing, Reg, which I just put to anybody is:
Is there any particular thought or recollection that you would like to
put down here?
Yes, Ed. Since being back in civilian life I have been over a
great number of aerodromes and to our squadrons out here in Australia, and it's really gratifying to see the type of young fellow who
is flying these beautiful aeroplanes today. Not that there is a
great deal of difference in flying. Basically, you push the
stick forward and the nose goes down; you pull the stick back
and the nose comes up. But the electronics and the academics who
are flying them, they are a great credit and let's keep our air force
flying.
Right. Well, on behalf of the War Memorial, Reg, thank you very much for making this tape as part of the history of No. 3.
[3SQN Assn repaired version of original transcript on https://www.awm.gov.au.]
![]()